Article content

Over the past year, a chorus has risen calling for an increase in spending on defence. Canada has been pressed to show we are putting enough effort into protecting and policing our own land, sea and air borders while also contributing to the collective security of North America and the NATO alliance. The recent NATO summit took the pressure up several notches.

Article content

Article content

Regardless of any arbitrary arithmetical targets, the case for Canada spending more on defence and security and investing smartly and briskly to raise our capabilities is a strong one. Clearly the world is more dangerous and unlikely to become less so any time soon.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Canada will see increasing stresses on our security as the guardian of the longest coastline in the world, of our Arctic archipelago and the airspace vital to the next generation of North American missile defence. As regional conflicts flare around the globe, Canada will be asked to contribute in some manner to operations as we have so many times in the past. Our economy and society will need ever stronger cybersecurity defences. Enhanced intelligence gathering will be key to all of these efforts.

Article content

The numbers coming out of the NATO summit are daunting, and there are no easy options when it comes to finding the money. The choices are borrow, tax, or cut other areas of spending to make room. We will end up doing a bit of all three — the question is in what mix and how fast.

Article content

Borrowing the incremental dollars means shifting the burden to future taxpayers to pay for greater effort today. It runs against inter-generational fairness and the debt load would leave us more vulnerable to shocks. Cutting other areas to make room is never easy. Let’s not pretend that cuts are coming to old age pensions or transfers to the provinces, territories and Indigenous governments, or that we will stop paying interest on government debt. Now we won’t be cutting defence, border services or security agencies. The “cuttable” part of federal spending is far less than the total and is nowhere near sufficient to generate the numbers needed to meet the new defence targets, even if we take a slow walk to the 2035 goalpost.

Article content

Article content

If there ever was a time when the tired old phrase “think outside the box” applies, this would be it. The box we are caught in is a revenue constraint quite purposefully created two decades ago by Jim Flaherty when he cut the GST by two points. Ever since, Canadian politicians have been painting themselves into a corner, pandering to short term electoral politics, bidding for tax holidays and cuts and treating the GST rate as untouchable.

Article content

Article content

The “truth to power” and “truth to voters” reality that makes many people uncomfortable and will make politicians squirm is that the national government simply needs more revenue to do all the things Canadians will expect in the remainder of the 2020s and beyond.

Article content

There is a way out of the box, out of the corner. Parliament could come together in the national interest and create a new Defence and Security Tax (DST), collected on the same base as the GST/HST, using the same exemptions and rebates for low-income households. It could be set up to start at a time of Parliament’s choosing, say, January 2027, be ramped up in steps and sunset after ten years. Taxing consumption on a broad base, not income, is the policy path most consistent with our aspirations for greater economic productivity and growth.