Dennis, 79, is worried about a market crash. Should he move his portfolio to 100% income?

Dennis, 79, is worried about a market crash. Should he move his portfolio to 100% income?

Cash in mattress
Anyone who has been investing for 20 years or more could likely handle an allocation of at least 40 per cent equities. Photo by Getty Images

Article content

In an increasingly complex world, the Financial Post should be the first place you look for answers. Our FP Answers initiative puts readers in the driver’s seat: you submit questions and our reporters find answers not just for you, but for all our readers. Today, we answer a question from Dennis about a safe mix of assets given fears of a market correction.

Financial Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or

Article content

Q. I am at a relatively healthy 79 years of age and my nest egg is still invested in equities to a 30 per cent range via mutual funds. The current standing of North American stock indexes in relation to current economic disparities, particularly in Canada, gives me considerable concern for the sustainability of these indices. Should I move 100 per cent to an income-based portfolio in anticipation of a market correction wherein the recovery period could exceed my monetary needs? Or is there a better solution? —Dennis

Article content

Article content

Article content

FP Answers: Dennis, as a person who has been concerned about high valuations (especially in the United States) for a few years now, I understand and share your discomfort. I’m going to quibble with the words “in anticipation of a correction.” In essence, what I’m saying is that there’s no reliable way of timing markets and most people should stay the course if their risk tolerance remains relatively stable. Has your tolerance changed for some non-market reason? If not, a 30 per cent allocation strikes me as being entirely reasonable and possibly even a bit low.

Article content

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

Anyone who has been investing for 20 years or more could likely handle an allocation of at least 40 per cent equities. Furthermore, the folks at FP Canada insist that a spry 79-year-old like yourself likely has more than a decade left, so the need to reduce risk may not be as pressing as you think. Given the relatively high income component you already have, you could easily take the money you need from the remaining 70 per cent while waiting for the 30 per cent to recover if the drawdown we anticipate finally materializes.

Article content

There’s an old saying that markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent. It’s a bit cheeky, but given your already prudent asset allocation and somewhat advanced age, I’m highly confident you will be in a position to disprove the adage in almost any scenario.

Article content

John De Goey is a portfolio manager with Designed Securities Ltd., regulated by the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and a member of the Canadian Investor Protection Fund.

Article content

Sponsorizzato
Sponsorizzato
Passa a Pro
Scegli il piano più adatto a te
Sponsorizzato
Sponsorizzato
Pubblicità
Leggi tutto
Download the Telestraw App!
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
×