This creative money transfer strategy among family members could raise red flags with CRA

This creative money transfer strategy among family members could raise red flags with CRA

If the borrower uses funds that ultimately originated with the lender, whether directly or through gifts, there is a risk CRA may treat the arrangement as circular.
If the borrower uses funds that ultimately originated with the lender, whether directly or through gifts, there is a risk CRA may treat the arrangement as circular. Photo by Ratana21/Getty Images

Article content

Q. I have loaned $500,000 to my wife at the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) prescribed low interest rate of three per cent and she has been paying the required interest. I am gifting $100,000 by bank transfer to my adult son, who is 21 years old. He will transfer the same amount by bank transfer to his mother (my wife). My wife will then transfer the same amount to me by bank transfer to reduce the outstanding loan amount by $100,000. The gift deed will be signed by the donor (the son) and the donee (his mother) mentioning gifting is voluntary.

Financial Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or

Article content

Article content

By doing several of these transfers, my wife will repay the entire loan amount and build up her own capital to invest, without having to worry about attributions on capital gains, interest, etc. At the time of transfers, none of us have any debts, owe creditors or CRA or have unsettled claims. Please give me your opinion on whether these gifts are considered legitimate? And could you confirm that attributions would not apply to her investment gains and losses, interest, etc.? Your response will be highly appreciated. —Daniel in St. John’s

Article content

Article content

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

FP Answers: Prescribed rate loans are a tool for families looking to split investment income and reduce their overall combined tax bill. The most common application is when you have family members with a big difference in their incomes who have lots of taxable investments.This strategy can save tax, but if done incorrectly, it can also trigger CRA scrutiny.

Article content

To avoid attribution of income from the loaned funds back to the lender, there are strict conditions. When it is between non-arm’s-length parties such as certain family members, the interest rate charged must be at least the prescribed rate at the time the loan is made. This rate is locked in for the life of the loan, regardless of future changes in interest rates.

Article content

Article content

Right now, the CRA prescribed rate is three per cent. A few years ago, it was only one per cent and the concept was understandably more popular. The interest must be paid annually within 30 days after the end of the calendar year in which it becomes payable. The interest is taxable to the lender and tax deductible by the borrower if they invest the borrowed funds in eligible income-producing assets. This must be properly documented with a written loan agreement and clear records of payments to stay compliant.

Article content

Article content

Repayments should come from the borrower’s resources. If the borrower uses funds that ultimately originated with the lender, whether directly or through gifts or other family members, there is a risk CRA may treat the arrangement as circular and apply attribution rules. This is where your approach could raise red flags, Daniel.

Article content

If the repayment is made indirectly, such as through your son in your example, CRA could challenge whether this repayment constitutes a genuine repayment or merely a continuation of the original loan. If the original loan is not truly repaid, because repayment comes from the lender, directly or indirectly, the attribution rules could continue to apply to income from your wife’s investments. This is sometimes referred to as the “novation” or refinancing risk.

Patrocinado
Patrocinado
Atualizar para Plus
Escolha o plano que é melhor para você
Patrocinado
Patrocinado
Anúncios
Leia mais
Download the Telestraw App!
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play
×